|
Introduction
An Unique Innovative Structural / Geo-technical Engineered Technology that
provides
Foundation Systems that, during their installation, utilize and or improve existing soils
conditions to levels higher than required by Design Loading. Upon Installation, the
Systems have been Pre-stressed, Pre-settled and Tested with known Structural Strength.
Product Description
- The
systems are designed and installed to develop the existing soils strengths to levels
higher than design loading requirements.
- They
can be installed in all types of soils, rock and or combinations thereof.
- They
can be designed and installed to handle virtually any type and intensity of loading.
- During the controlled installation process, the entire system, which includes the
surrounding and load bearing media, is consolidated, compacted, pre-stressed,
pre-settled and tested to loading higher than the design requirements.
- The
use of high pressure hydraulic power allow a precisely controlled and accurately
measured application of force, which directly indicates the strengths of the
installed foundation systems in their final installed position or at any point during
their installation.
System Components
- Installing hydraulics - Provide a virtually unlimited source of
installing force that can be precisely applied, controlled and accurately
measured, on a continued preplanned basis during the installation process.
- Soils/Soft
Rock and Soft/ Hard Rock Anchors - Are used as an installing tool to provide the
axial resisting strength required to install foundation systems, not having
design uplift forces required. Upon completion of the installation they are
removed and reused. In systems where uplift forces are required they
remain, as installed, and become a part of the system.
- Moment
Foundation - Is designed and installed to accommodate axial bearing and uplift,
overturning and torsional moment, angular, ground line shear loads in any
combinations and intensities thereof. All installed strengths are determined by
the frictional and/or cohesive developed strengths of the soils in contact with
the foundation surface during the installation process.
- Combined
Moment and Bearing Foundation - Is designed and installed to accommodate loading
that is of a predominately axial bearing/download nature. The main Bearing strength
is directly developed by the direct compaction/consolidation of the soils;
reactions and resistance to the loading applied to the contacting bearing
surface of the foundation.
Use
Advantages as compared to other Systems
·
A Structural / Geo-technical Engineered Technology that
provides the ability to design and install Foundation Systems that
improves existing soils strengths to conform to and exceed
design requirements rather than adapting the design to fit the
existing characteristics of the soil.
1.
Can be used in soils, rock or combinations thereof.
2.
Can be designed to bear and or restrain any type and
combinations of loading and intensities thereof.
3.
Pre-stresses, pre-settles via compaction / consolidation of
the soils within the developed load bearing Zone of influence and tests
the entire system during the controlled installation process.
4.
The ability to accurately apply and know the hydraulically
applied installation force, via gauge reading of system pressures,
provides a direct indication of the installed system's strength.
The minimum required, gauge read, installing force is established
during the design process.
5.
The technology uses standard, acceptable and easily
understood engineering concepts, formula, charts and graphs in its
design and use.
- The systems are
ecologically Sound as they require minimal site disturbance during
their installation and can be easily removed and the site
returned to its natural state upon completion of their purpose /
use.
The systems are completely removable, reusable and or recyclable.
1.
Unlike concrete the composition of the systems have no
adverse effects on the surrounding soils.
2.
Minimal soils are removed during the installation process and are
returned to the system, immediately upon its completion.
3.
Site access requirements are minimal due to the limited use of
heavy equipment and the ease of handling due to the portability of
the systems and their installation equipment.
4.
Adjacent structures, trees and vegetation are not affected by
the installation. Tower installations have been limited to less than
a 50 ft x 50 ft. site.
- The Systems are
economically beneficial as they inherently provide savings in
time and costs to the overall project.
1.
Site and soils investigation requirements are minimal.
2.
Design and estimating requirements are simplified, thereby
requiring less time.
3.
Overall equipment requirements are reduced.
4.
Manpower requirements and installation time are greatly
reduced. A supervisor and 3 laborers can install an average system within
a 3 to 4 hours period of time. The supported and or
restrained structure can, in most cases, be immediately erected
and or attached using the same crew and equipment.
5.
Climate and weather have no effect on the installation
process.
·
The systems inherently solve many existing design and
construction problems.
1.
The structural integrity of the system is known upon
installation.
2.
Grounding/lightning protection is provided by the installed
system.
3.
Pre-settlement has been accomplished during installation.
4.
The systems eliminate existing problems in regions with permafrost and or ice jacking conditions in the freeze/thaw
zones of the supporting and or restraining soils.
5.
Liabilities and risks are greatly reduced for all
participants, including the end user.
6.
Extras are virtually eliminated due to encountering unknown
soils conditions.
7.
The systems directly, not frictionally, utilize the strength
of rock, which simplifies the installations of rock foundations and
anchorages as compared to those requiring grout and or epoxies.
The Potential Impact
of Structural / Geo-technical Engineered Steel Foundation Systems to
Worldwide Construction
There is no other known apparatus and/or methods known that
accomplishes, in part or whole, that which is described above as
supported by the following;
- Prior Art
Based on accumulated information from Soils Engineering by B.
K. Hough & Foundations of Structures by Dunham, the Design,
Installation and Use of Foundation & Anchorage Systems is a
complex Art that requires experience and/or specific knowledge in
many fields:
1.
Geology - The understanding of the formation of all
components of the earth's crust, whether rock or soil.
2.
Pedology - The study of soil and soil forming
processes.
3.
Soil Physics & Chemistry - The investigation and
determination of the fundamental properties which control the
engineering behavior of soils and the development of processes for
their improvement.
4.
Civil Engineering - The branches of engineering which
relate particularly to soil problems include hydraulics, strength
of materials, mechanics, soils engineering and structural
engineering.
5.
Construction Experience - The designer requires a
first-hand familiarity with many different types of construction,
besides the above indicated technical knowledge. It is seldom
possible to practice successfully in this branch of engineering
without spending long periods in the field, not merely as an
observer or consultant but in responsible charge of work.
6.
A knowledge of Economies of Time and Costs in all phases in
the overall process is required.
7.
Methods currently utilized in design, installation and use
are contained within the following approaches;
·
The Empirical Approach - This is the oldest and still most
commonly used method. It is the process of designing or constructing
the new entirely on the basis of experience with the old without
reference to science or theory.
·
The Analytical Approach - It involves an analysis of the
stress distribution created by given conditions of loading and
a knowledge, usually based on laboratory tests, of the
stress-strain characteristics of the material soil which
is subject to loading. The characteristics must be determined
experimentally, and due to the variable nature of soil, tests must be
conducted for each location. In view of the variability of the
soil such investigation results place inherent limitations on
the value and accuracy of results obtained by any analytical
process, limitations which cannot be overcome by use of advanced theory or
complicated mathematical operations. Nevertheless, experience has
shown that certain analytical procedures give results that are in
reasonable agreement with observations on actual systems. Thus it
appears possible to utilize these procedures with soils under certain
conditions in spite of the many natural obstacles.
·
While there is a tendency in engineering to turn from
empiricism wherever possible and to extend the use of analytical methods,
it is certain that this transition will not take place overnight.
There are certain practical reasons for the permanent retention of
many empirical methods.
- New
Developments From Soils Engineering by B. K. Hough. It is interesting to note signs
of a new approach to certain problems. Traditionally, the engineer expects to adapt
the design of a proposed structure to existing soils conditions. Now, in certain
cases when soil conditions are unfavorable, it appears feasible to improve them in
one way or another. Usually improvement is based on soil compaction
ever increasing attention is being given to improvement of sub-grades,
base courses, and embankments by various types of compaction. This
has been facilitated by advances in design and construction of rollers
and other compaction equipment. Possibly more dramatic is the development
of methods for compacting existing formations to considerable depths below the
surface in order to improve their supporting capacity for structural
foundations. For loose granular soils vibrating compactors are being used,
while for soft silts and clays various methods of compression and improvement
of drainage are being utilized. Under certain special conditions chemicals may
be injected into or admixed with soils to solidify them or render them
less pervious.
Whenever any of these various methods can be used economically
to accomplish a
desired alteration in soil properties, there is a
prospect of making
soil conform to design requirements rather than
adjusting designed
to fit existing
characteristics of the soil. While it is
necessary to maintain a conservative attitude as
to what may be
accomplished in this way, if such methods can be extended and
improved
in practicability and economy, the nature of soils engineering
might undergo a very
extensive change.
Conclusion
B. K. Hough's prediction, in his Soils Engineering Manual under
New Developments, has been fulfilled along with the following improvements;
-
Not only has a new method been developed
to alter the soils to conform to design requirements, the method has been accomplished within the installation of the foundation system.
-
The installation process not only alters the soils to conform to
design requirements, it also pre-stresses and accurately tests the load
bearing installed strength of the overall system, including the altered soils within
the developed load bearing zone of influence.
-
The foundation and / or anchor column allows relief of pore pressure changes that
would effect the systems' developed load bearing zone of influence.
-
Costly multi-layered Design Safety Factors can now
be replaced by a known Installed Safety Factor.
-
The methods and procedures used in Structural /
Geo-technical
Engineered Steel Foundation Systems are only unique in their combined use in a
manner that is basically ; simple. There are no new theories and formula.
-
Their capacity for unlimited loading, precisely controlled load
application and the ability for easy removal and reuse provide an economical
method for testing structures and all other foundation and anchoring systems.
-
Their use can expand the capabilities of precise on site soils testing
and evaluation.
Click This Icon To See DOE
Report
Or Right Click and 'Save As'
For Later Viewing. |